Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ronnie raygun
Honestly I thought it would go: gay "marriage", then polygamy.

I was wrong. Apparently it's gay "marriage" then pedophilia.

The rest can wait.

Once gay "marriage" is the law of the land, how can ANYONE argue against polygamy? They can't make a cogent aguement against it, since the standard is "loving" each other.

That's it.

So let those men who molest their daughters out of jail. They "love" each other.

50 posted on 03/05/2013 6:05:56 PM PST by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: boop

>>how can ANYONE argue against polygamy

If there’s an argument to be made against it, I expect it might be found in an historical analysis and comparison of the socio-biological fitness of tribal harems Vs cultures composed of monogamous families.

Which reproductive strategy yields greater long-term fitness?


84 posted on 03/06/2013 4:38:46 AM PST by TArcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: boop

“So let those men who molest their daughters out of jail. They “love” each other.”

That has kind of been my point all along. I should be able to marry my dad, my brother, my sister or even my mother. I’m too old to have kids so you can’t use that argument. Who gets to judge where the line is drawn?


114 posted on 03/07/2013 10:18:11 AM PST by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson