1 posted on
03/03/2013 12:35:28 PM PST by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
Even if we taxed the rich at 100% we wouldn’t cover the current deficits. Houston we have a (spending) problem.
2 posted on
03/03/2013 12:49:00 PM PST by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: tobyhill; All
![](http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/Kyvs9oyWjcdaruOyPhL64w--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9aW5zZXQ7aD01MTk7cT04NTt3PTM2OQ--/http://globalfinance.zenfs.com/images/US_AHTTP_AP_HEADLINES_BUSINESS/4e6a3a417f1717072b0f6a70670036c1_original.jpg)
And yet Obama and the Dems don't think the "rich" are taxed enough. This is going to hurt the job situation -- as someone said, nobody got a job from a poor person...
3 posted on
03/04/2013 11:05:46 AM PST by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: tobyhill
Someone needs to define “wealthy”. The poverty line used to be, and might still be around $34,000. But what is middle class, and wealthy?
4 posted on
03/04/2013 12:36:37 PM PST by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson