Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/03/2013 12:35:28 PM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tobyhill

Even if we taxed the rich at 100% we wouldn’t cover the current deficits. Houston we have a (spending) problem.


2 posted on 03/03/2013 12:49:00 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill; All

And yet Obama and the Dems don't think the "rich" are taxed enough. This is going to hurt the job situation -- as someone said, nobody got a job from a poor person...

3 posted on 03/04/2013 11:05:46 AM PST by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Someone needs to define “wealthy”. The poverty line used to be, and might still be around $34,000. But what is middle class, and wealthy?


4 posted on 03/04/2013 12:36:37 PM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson