I’m not going to argue with you on the social positions. You are right that he fip-flopped as he was the governor of the People’s Republic of Massachusetts.
However. applying the flip-flop tag on his business history with respect to understanding how to create jobs, grow small business, rein in debt, encourage and promote policies that grow the economy does not sell with me. I say that after having opposed Romney in the primaries. My support and contributions were with Gingrich. Romney is a real capitalist businessman and we would be far, far better off with him over the socialist who is working hard to destroy us.
You will have my agreement that Romney was unacceptable on social policy, no question. You will never have my agreement that there was not a dime’s worth of difference between Romney and Obama on the economic policies that are the lifeblood of our country. Without a strong economy and states’ rights balance the country falls and all the social policies you talked about really are meaningless as we fight for our lives first.
The reality is that one cannot split the President. I fully admit he has a stellar business record. But we cannot vote for Mit Businessman and not Mit Gay Abortion Gun grabber.
You vote for one, you get the other and all that implies.
No there will never be another Reagan and Christ isn’t going to run either. Flawed people are and not even Reagan was perfect. But this isn’t a case of Romney being 80%. Romney wasn’t 50% even if you split social and financial issues 50-50.
His election meant abortion with Repub/Conservative support, homosexualization with Repub/Con support, gun grabbing with Repub/Con support and more.
I am not willing to do like recent freepers said and trade the life of a child for some POS moderate’s vote. And if that means another dem gets elected, the result is on their head, not mine as I am not donning the pom poms and excusing my actions.