Reality doesn’t offend me. I never said anything like what you are trying to portray. There’s nothing about “moving right” or moving left” that I have to say. The reality is that the purity of your position was so damned smart that it was absolutely instrumental in placing this vicious, America-hating Marxist into office and you continue to opine that that was a smart thing to do. Everyone else who varied from your line of thought, well, they’re just idiots. But it’s not AH to call them idiots because you and only you get to erect your very own pedestal upon which you can preach your ideological purity to the rest of us.
You continue to defend the efficacy of your actions so I can only assume you are proud of them and the results they achieved. So should I “try it (being as smart as you claim you are and everyone else isn’t) sometime”, I guess I should come to you and ask if I am being smart enough to meet your obviously high standards.
What will I ask, “Am I working hard enough to re-elect someone like 0bama?” Should I seek other ways to destroy America or am I doing enough already?” “Are there any planks left from the Communist manifesto that haven’t been put into place?”
You’ve worked on three characteristics of liberal arguments very nicely here; the AH attack, the topic change tactic, and the complete unwillingness to see the unintended consequences of your actions.
Keep at it, and congratulations of electing your candidate.
Another sign of the dinosaur known as “Stupidicus Pontificus” is a genetic need to ascribe a substance known as “Purity” to anything he deems evil. This thread is loaded with examples.
If the stupid gave a moment’s thought (Ah! but then they would no longer be stupid!) they would realize three things:
1: Purity is the opposite of corruption.
2: That puts them in the position of preferring corruption.
3: There exists a party platform for a reason. Following it does not make one evil/wrong/whatever unless the party platform is in and of itself wrong/evil.
So do you believe the traditional conservative/Republican platform is wrong or evil? Do you believe purity is something we should avoid and embrace wholesale corruption?
Extreme examples? Yup. But that’s where claiming to be conservative while fighting for the correctness of embracing liberalism puts you.
Squarely.
The only people using the word “purity” in any context are you Mitt Defenders. We on the Right (which you abandoned) are perfectly willing to follow the 80% rule. Mitt didn’t break 50%. That puts him on the left. Which you support.
Tell me again about “Purity”. Then jump back on the screen as we already have enough of the stupid to have an Idiocracy of our own.