Look, I'm not here to defend Romney. He wasn't my first choice. Don't think that we would have had no power to affect the decisions made by a President Romney, unlike with the current resident. But I do believe the economy would have been a whole let better with Romney in the WH than what it is going to be for the next four years with Zero. And I believe we have you and people like you to thank for that.
“Don’t think that we would have had no power to affect the decisions made by a President Romney, unlike with the current resident. “
Yup. We have all sorts of ‘feet to fire’ power over the Congress and It would surely have kept Romney’s liberalism in check too. Just like Bhoner. He fears caving in and has been a staunch Conservative since Romney lost...forever even!
Oh wait....
Yet here you are doing just that, and lying about conservatives giving us Obama, you guys gave us Obama by finding a creature that could lose an election that couldn't be lost.
You are currently fighting for more Romney's on this thread by defending him and attacking those who refuse to support him, the question is, have you and yours managed to destroy the republican party for good, is this embracing of the democrat agenda, a permanent situation or can we Reagan conservatives defeat you.
Already your team has started efforts to Romneyize the 2014 election and to counter the incredibly successful grass roots tea party gains.
Now where did I hear that blame concept before while accepting no responsibility. It certainly isn't a conservative way. Hmmmm. Obama, it's all Bush's fault! somehow I forgot that or dismissed that static blabber from my mind. But that doesn't make room for more blabber.
Romney is pro-abortion, supports homosexual military, Boy Scouts, plus government healthcare and everything else he could do to be anti-republican.
You mean those evil people opposed to those things?