Yes I understand your awkward, mangled statement makes perfect sense to you.
Like many misguided denizens of liberalism, you prefer to demonize the law-makers instead of the law-breakers. Perhaps you engage in those activities yourself, and feel threatened. As for the other side, perhaps they’re your suppliers. Perfect — it might also explain the mangled syntax.
Now excuse me for a while, I have to “at one remove” myself from this thread before I throw up on the keyboard.
And, at one remove, of the War on Drugs that incentivizes such system-playing - nobody gets threatened by rumrunners seeking their stealthily-shipped hooch, because there's no incentive to stealthily ship hooch. [emphasis added]
Like many misguided denizens of liberalism, you prefer to demonize the law-makers instead of the law-breakers.
Which part of "and" did you not understand?
Perhaps you engage in those activities yourself, and feel threatened. As for the other side, perhaps they’re your suppliers. Perfect — it might also explain the mangled syntax.
And here come the Drug Warrior ad hominem slurs, right on schedule.
I have to “at one remove” myself
A little free education for you:
re·move
[ri-moov] verb, re·moved, re·mov·ing, noun noun
15.
a degree of difference, as that due to descent, transmission, etc.: a folk survival, at many removes, of a druidic rite.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/remove