We know we lost 2006 simply because the public perceived that the Republicans were overrun with homosexuals. They, the public, don't vote for homosexuals in the Republican party ~ at least not knowingly
So, how many times can you lose 2006 before you figure it out.
Now if the gay folks want to give us money, and write fawning articles about our candidates, or even vote ~ all of that's fine. We do not want to have them identified as chief spokespersons for our candidates, nor do we want them to be our RNC chairmen or women or whatevers.
They keep their distance we'll be writing tax laws that protect the rich guys ~ but they gotta' stay back.
There should be no disagreement on this matter.
“Allowing the gays to open up at CPAC resulted in what seemed to be gay dominance.”
A bar manager told me once, “If you have one black in the band, okay. But if you have two or three, it’s a cultural signal. Your upscale, yuppie bar will become a black bar in days. They will intimidate and drive away the high-value, high-return whites. You’ll end up with drugs, fisticuffs and gunfights. I’ve lost two bars that way. Forced out of business.
I think that letting in an opposing agenda does that in politics too. Let’s face it. Homosexual is an orientation. Gay means communist. (Progressive, liberal…all the same thing.)