Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

As an employer I am liable for the acts of my employees and I am negligent if I do not do a background check.After the results I decide if I will hire the candidate

Your attitude is confusing, your comments indicate that you have no idea that you know what you are talking about.

If one of your parolees came back to rob your customer YOU would be held responsible.

Remember Elizabeth Smart and who kidnapped her?

Do you have a genitalia issue and how is that comment pertinent to this discussion?

An Employer’s Liability for Employee’s Acts

Negligent Hiring or Retention
Negligent hiring or retention liability, unlike job related misconduct, arises from acts performed by an employee outside the scope of his or her employment. The most common example of this is to hold an employer liable for the criminal conduct of an employee, which is obviously outside the scope of employment. The basis for liability is that the employer acted carelessly in hiring a criminal for a job that the employer should have expected would expose others to harm. Here are a few examples:

¦Example 1: An ice cream sales company hires a man convicted of sexually assaulting a minor to drive its ice cream truck and sell ice cream to children. The business is likely liable because it was negligent in hiring a man known to have assaulted minors, and then giving him access to those minors as customers.
¦Example 2: An elder care facility hires a woman convicted of fraud and identity theft against elderly people to look after and care for the facilities patients. The business is likely liable because it was negligent in hiring a woman who was already convicted of scamming the elderly and giving her access to potential victims.
¦Example 3: A cable company hires a man without a background check and directs him to go to customer’s houses and install cable equipment. It turns out he’s been convicted twice of rape, and while at a customer’s house to install equipment, he rapes the occupant. The business is likely liable because it was negligent in hiring someone who has access to private houses without a background check, as well as being liable for hiring someone with a history of rape to meet privately with customers in their home.
The key to most negligent hiring and retention cases is providing employees with access to potential victims without doing the necessary examination of the employees’. Accordingly, to avoid liability for negligent hiring, an employer should always run a background check on an employee, and be especially careful if the employee has contact with the public. If you as an employer become aware of something after the fact, then handle the matter immediately to avoid negligent retention liability.


19 posted on 02/24/2013 8:10:35 AM PST by COUNTrecount (Clear eyes. Full hearts. Can't fail .But We Did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: COUNTrecount

If you aren’t man enough to go back and read my original comment, you may as well crawl right back into God’s front pocket and feel smug about yourself.

You may go now.


21 posted on 02/24/2013 8:14:35 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson