Replies

You mean THIS Orly Taitz:

“Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen by the same attorney Taitz
was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration
day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more
challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the
public, media, State Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case
was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle
repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were
deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which
was not the case.

Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was
able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the
case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the
conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S.
President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget
a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U. S. Presidency
he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear
that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the
justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even
existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is
HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or
death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.”

Yep, calling Scalia clueless and saying the law clerks deserve death is a GREAT way to get the US Supreme Court to accept your case! She also compared the US Supreme Court to Hitler, which is guaranteed to impress!