[Bryan]

That's the guy. Democrats fought tooth and nail to protect him from impeachment, and then re-elected him for the next 20 years or so.

The bizarre thing is that whatever Democrats try to do in Congress, they claim "It's for the children."

Gun grabbing? "It's for the children, think of those poor victims at Sandy Hook and Columbine. No, this is not about controlling rural white males, who tend to vote for Republicans."

Education spending? "It's for the children. Think of those underprivileged children. Their only chance is to get a good education so that they can get a good job. No, this is not about giving more money and power to the teachers' unions, who tend to vote for Democrats."

Public housing? Public aid? "It's for the children. Think of those underprivileged children. You want us to throw them out on the street? No, this is not about providing a base of operations for their drug-dealing, gangster fathers and their prostitute mothers, who tend to vote for Democrats."

But when a Democratic Congressman wants to sodomize a young male page, or when a Democratic voter wants to abort her unborn child, or when children are buying drugs from gang members wearing Obama T-shirts, those children don't deserve protection.

[South40]

The Mark Foley "scandal" revolved around him allegedly sending sexually explicit instant messages to an underage page. I think it was wring, but that's just me. The left, however, defended Studds' perverted tryst with an underage page wherein he actually had gay sex with the boy and you're right, the even reelected him. This was after he turned his back to members of congress while they read the censure.

liberals are nothing if not hypocrites.