Suppressors should never have been restricted. Even most of Europe recognized that. Another tyranny foisted on us by the Roosevelt administration.
1 posted on
02/21/2013 6:29:20 PM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Most people don't realize that suppressors only muffle the report of the rifle enough to not require the shooter to use ear protection. They all think that it's like the movies - what do you expect from your average guy who has no idea of what firearms really are and what they are and are not capable of... Think of the Governor of NY who thinks the 2nd amendment is all about deer hunting. Sad
2 posted on
02/21/2013 6:38:54 PM PST by
JD91
To: marktwain
it saves your hearing because it affects the shock wave.
it was considered good manners to use them, to not cause unnecessary noise to your neighbors.
3 posted on
02/21/2013 6:42:31 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: marktwain
Excellent move in WY.
Make this a national trend. My hearing is half shot from hunting. I wear protecting when shooting at the range, but even then I would like to have suppressors, particularly indoors or under cover of a roof outdoors. This is a health issue. Not a security issue.
To: marktwain
A secondary market might emerge.
9 posted on
02/21/2013 8:14:12 PM PST by
grumpygresh
(Democrats delenda est.)
To: marktwain
...“anywhere where game may occur”,...I believe that would be nearly the entirety of Wyoming.
10 posted on
02/21/2013 9:35:35 PM PST by
TigersEye
(The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson