[Yosemitest]

Isn't it interesting how the second page of the article has an intentional "accidentally placed" photo OVER part of the text?

I believe that text reads as follows:

Their allegations include the following:

1. Soetoro/Obama has been using a fake social security number
2. A query using the SSN yields the name "Harrison J. Bounel," a purported relative of Michelle Robinson (Obama)
3. Soetoro/Obama submitted a forged birth certificate
4. Soetoro/Obama cannot pass the government's E-Verify background check system
5. Soetoro/Obama forged his Selective Service registration
6. John Brennan, nominee to head the CIA, tampered with Obama's passport records to remove birther evidence such as his Indonesian citizenship
7. In 2012, the New York Times reported that up to 70 percent of Obama's Twitter followers are fake.

And just now the whole article has changed, and reads entirely different.

[Yosemitest]

CORRECTION:

"And just now the whole article has changed, and reads entirely different."

Disregard. I looked at the wrong link.

But I noticed the article also tried to cover up this part of the article.

On Feb. 3, a retired Washington State Supreme Court justice, Richard B. Sanders, announced that he will help a plaintiff avoid punitive fines ($13,000) levied by the state's attorney general for filing a birther case.

This weekend, birthers will stage nationwide rallies aimed at all three branches of the government to protest Obama's occupancy of the White House.

That's all I found so far that, in my opinion, were intentional mistakes, based on the information that they tried to conceal.