We use to say, "There's no Nookie like Nanookie!"
Posted on 02/17/2013 1:27:50 PM PST by Nachum
You knew it was coming. Scientific American — which often pushes cultural agendas as much as scientific ideas — has an article informing us that polyamorous people have so much to teach the rest of us about life. From “The New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good For You“ One thing that seems to unite the polyamorous community is a real enthusiasm for digging into emotions. Honesty, openness and communication are cornerstones for polyamorous relationships, Holmes has found. “They’re talking a lot, they’re negotiating a lot, they’re bringing their feelings to the table a lot,” he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Begins? Big Love was on HBO in 2006 and Sister Wives on TLC in 2010. It “began” before Zero.
“They’re talking a lot, they’re negotiating a lot, they’re bringing their feelings to the table a lot,”
Sounds like a lot of whining goes on..
I think SHOWTIME had a series about Polyamory too
How many wives did Solomon have?
Sad but true. Guess it makes God’s choice a little bit easier.
I suspect that we’re talking Equality here, where husbands and wives have Equal Opportunity?
I’m fairly certain that concept predates Catholicism.
Sad but true. The Corey Feldman story is a perfect example.
We use to say, "There's no Nookie like Nanookie!"
Incidentally, “Scientific American” was run by commies, the Piel family. Maybe it still is.
polyamory is apparently a “cleaned up” version of male and female bi-sexual sluttiness
The human condition affords so few pleasures however I can live without sex, but why if you are healthy and capable?
Beastiality in the wings.
Perhaps it is worth noting that sin has been normal for a very long time, but some of us still find grace to struggle against this normality and raise objection to when someone tries to assert that their favorite sin is, contrary to fact, a moral good.
Adultery is already very common and not illegal.
It seems like every ten years or so they make a push for this. People are dumb enough to try it then find out the consequences later.
If its the will of allah then petro dollars have found their way into the pockets of the editors and owners of scientific american. Every one wants to schill for allah when the price is right.
Indeed.
Christ’s teachings in Matthew 19:4-6:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2019:4-6&version=ESV
where He is quoting Genesis 1:27:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%201:27&version=ESV
and Genesis 2:24:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%202:24&version=ESV
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.