Skip to comments.
Gun ban would protect more than 2,200 firearms
Associated Press ^
| Feb 16, 2013 6:29 PM (ET)
| EILEEN SULLIVAN
Posted on 02/16/2013 4:49:19 PM PST by DJ MacWoW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
It has always been about making the populace helpless. We know it's never been about anyones safety but theirs.
Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. - George Washington
41
posted on
02/16/2013 5:43:27 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(My faith and politics cannot be separated)
To: muir_redwoods
I’d rather just build my own mags - unless they make springs illegal too. I’ll also bet some enterprising young manufacturer could skirt the law by making two or three shipments of parts that, when combined, would form a perfect 30 rd mag.
To: DJ MacWoW
Gun ban would protect more than 2,200 firearmsSerial murderer spared over 7 billion people!
To: muir_redwoods
44
posted on
02/16/2013 5:51:27 PM PST
by
davetex
(Location: The Alamo)
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Then I’ll switch to my Enfield No. 5 Mk. 1.
45
posted on
02/16/2013 5:53:11 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Longbow1969
Dang! You could get a job with them. But I can’t imagine any of us wanting to be anywhere near the unicorn and rainbow crowd.
46
posted on
02/16/2013 5:53:46 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(My faith and politics cannot be separated)
To: DJ MacWoW
47
posted on
02/16/2013 5:54:42 PM PST
by
Iron Munro
(I miss America, don't you?)
To: muir_redwoods
Tying yourself in knots trying to strain the limits of compliance misses the point and submits to oppression.
48
posted on
02/16/2013 5:57:21 PM PST
by
ctdonath2
(3% of the population perpetrates >50% of homicides...but gun control advocates blame metal boxes.)
To: DJ MacWoW
The 1994 “Assaut Weapons” ban was also touted as protecting guns. The recent DiFi proposal shows that the 1994 Law’s “protected” guns are only as safe as the next gun ban.
The most terrifying guns for the liberal elite are not AWs, but long range precision sniper rifles (hunters’ favorite bolt actions). DiFi admitted as much while crafting the AW ban in the early 90s.
It’s only a matter of time before they ban all firearms.
To: SandRat
Is my M1 Garand rifle safe? It will be if you hacksaw off the bayonet stud and file it down /sarc + ROFL
50
posted on
02/16/2013 5:59:52 PM PST
by
imardmd1
(An armed society is a polite society -- but dangerous for the fool --)
To: ctdonath2
No I’m asking a technical question. Jumping to inaccurate conclusions in not cardio exercise.
51
posted on
02/16/2013 6:02:51 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: DJ MacWoW
Given that it’s an FBI agent, he probably means that it’s a joke to allow the other, non-banned ones. They aren’t much in the way of supporting liberty, as far as I have been able to determine.
52
posted on
02/16/2013 6:06:46 PM PST
by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: DJ MacWoW
"One model of that firearm, the Ruger .223 caliber Mini-14, is on the proposed list to be banned, while a different model of the same gun is on a list of exempted firearms in legislation the Senate is considering."
Next thing you know, they'll be outlawing accurate firearms with barrel twist rates useful for self-defense and barrels that are easy to swap for everyone except government employees and other elite folks. Oh...looks like they're working on that.
53
posted on
02/16/2013 6:08:29 PM PST
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: muir_redwoods
The better technical question is whether a homemade 30 round mag made from a kit counts as being subject to interstate commerce.
54
posted on
02/16/2013 6:10:07 PM PST
by
ctdonath2
(3% of the population perpetrates >50% of homicides...but gun control advocates blame metal boxes.)
To: coloradan
55
posted on
02/16/2013 6:12:20 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(My faith and politics cannot be separated)
To: Ken522
So far - they havent gotten around to either the Garand nor the semi-auto M1A yet .... Reason is -- bait-and-switch. The Director of Civilian Marksmanship has been selling these (and M1 Carbines and 1903 Springfields) to U. S. citizens for many years. Then, having sold them to us, they are going to confiscate and destroy them? Maybe --
56
posted on
02/16/2013 6:13:19 PM PST
by
imardmd1
(An armed society is a polite society -- but dangerous for the fool --)
To: DJ MacWoW
Agreed. Trying to sugar coat poison to make it more palatable for the masses to swallow.
57
posted on
02/16/2013 6:23:26 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: DJ MacWoW
If I stole 10% of the AP’s assets, I would claim to have protected the remaining 90%!
I wonder if the courts would buy that.
58
posted on
02/16/2013 6:23:42 PM PST
by
Right Wing Assault
(Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
That “nose” got it’s start in 1934 with a tax.
That grievance still needs some redress...
59
posted on
02/16/2013 6:24:37 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: Right Wing Assault
If the judge thought you were liberal and the AP conservative, absolutely.
60
posted on
02/16/2013 6:25:57 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(My faith and politics cannot be separated)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson