Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In response to the collective outrage, BDN buckled under the pressure and officially dropped its request on Friday, promising to destroy any of the material that was shared thus far.
1 posted on 02/16/2013 9:12:00 AM PST by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EXCH54FE

A kick in the crotch is the only thing these bastards understand.


2 posted on 02/16/2013 9:15:59 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

However, the Sussman/Rep Pingree owned Portland Press Herald is taking up the banner. Emergency legislation to prevent the gathering of CCW info in Maine is being fast tracked through the legislature with the governor in support.

CCW permit applications have exploded in Maine. The waiting period is now up to 90 days (vs 30 a few weeks ago) and the backlog is about 2400 applications. I don’t have a current number for total CCW holders in Maine but a few years ago it was about 30,000 or around 3% of the adult population.


3 posted on 02/16/2013 9:17:30 AM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
“The BDN has never had any intention to release identifying information about permit holders and said so in our request,”

Yeah...there is this road to hell I keep hearing about paved with "Good intention"

4 posted on 02/16/2013 9:20:26 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

In these times of seeing technology as the panacea for all ills, a law abiding citizen ought to be able to be immediately told what God-given rights are being limited simply by asking on a website.

A CCW should be an implied right of any law-abiding citizen.
Given the extensive profile that law-enforcment maintains on every citizen the “Instant Check” burden should be on law-enforcement, if they have reason to believe someone lawfully stopped should not have the automatic right of concealed carry.

These ‘technology initiatives’ should just as easily be able to be used to limit government, not expand it’s power


8 posted on 02/16/2013 9:35:14 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

They are sons of bitches. In their “minds” the law-abiding honest non-violent citizen who when through the procedures required to obtain a permit is the CRIMINAL, while the violent thug is the HERO.

Proof: the left has no intention of taking guns from criminals.


10 posted on 02/16/2013 9:37:40 AM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Newspapers using intimidation tactics against lawful citizens.

They may want to check 6 quite often.


12 posted on 02/16/2013 9:42:53 AM PST by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Publish name, home address, telephone, email and Google Street View pics of their homes and offices.

To illustrate if there is a pattern between geography and Liberal Arrogance; research and educational purposes only of course.


14 posted on 02/16/2013 9:52:30 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

“arms” are for all, not just for “law abiding” citizens.

If you were black and living in the south in the 1940’s the powers that be could decide you were not law abiding enough, of good enough character or make any other claim to deny your inalienable right to “bear arms”. (Selma)
If you are living in any Demon-rat controlled hell-hole, they can decide that you are not equal-enough to protect your family. (Chicago)
Don’t push the “law abiding” part too far. If you get a parking ticket ‘cuz you missed feeding the meter by 2 minutes, you are not law-abiding.

The Constitution does not state “law-abiding”.
How about the Federal/State/Local Gubmint gets out of the business of denying inalienable rights completely by going with Constitutional Carry everywhere?


17 posted on 02/16/2013 10:15:46 AM PST by Macoozie (1) Win the Senate 2) Repeal Obamacare 3) Impeach Roberts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

I like the link to the Happy Valentine’s day from guns.com

No way those gals can conceal their guns.


18 posted on 02/16/2013 10:25:20 AM PST by Second Amendment First ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Research and investigative purposes.

Just like San Francisco’s Bernie Ward had child porn on his PC for “research purposes.”


19 posted on 02/16/2013 10:30:24 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

North Carolina has legislation in the works protecting confidentiality of CCW holders.


20 posted on 02/16/2013 10:39:45 AM PST by gitmo ( If your theology doesn't become your biography it's useless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Registration———————————>Confiscation.


21 posted on 02/16/2013 10:50:34 AM PST by JPG (ion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
Wonder how much flack they caught from Stephan
"NRA Should 'Clean Up Blood, Brains and Chunks of Intestine'
(if you cant read) "then you’ve got, the Army, Iraq, I don’t know, something like that.”
King

He's quite the big suppository in the rectum liberal bastion, that todays N.E. states have become.
23 posted on 02/16/2013 12:41:10 PM PST by 45semi (A police state is always preceded by a nanny state...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Lesson No. 1: When conservatives and patriots get organized and scream at the leftists, they back down. It’s all about taking the Founder’s warnings to heart and acting - liberty requires vigilance.


25 posted on 02/16/2013 4:48:23 PM PST by sergeantdave (The FBI has declared war on the Marine Corps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
The BDN has never had any intention to release identifying information about permit holders...

And I'm the King of England.

27 posted on 02/17/2013 1:08:15 PM PST by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
The fuss over the request is largely due to the precedent set by the Journal News, a NYC-based publication that upon obtaining lists of gun owners from local police departments created interactive maps displaying their names and addresses.

But BDN’s leadership claimed that they weren’t going to do what the Journal News did, they were simply going to study the information, examine it to see if any trends related to crime and public safety emerge.


They only did it for the sake of the chirrrdren...

28 posted on 02/17/2013 1:12:29 PM PST by fattigermaster (When tigers hunt, the jackals profit...when tigers sleep, the jackals rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson