Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
it's logical to assume that at least some segment of voters might be influenced in to backing Candidate A not so much because they agree with him, but because it looks like he's the one who's going to win.

I suspect this has about as much empirical backing as global warming.

5 posted on 02/15/2013 10:02:47 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei; nickcarraway
[nc] ...backing Candidate A not so much because they agree with him, but because it looks like he's the one who's going to win.

I suspect this has about as much empirical backing as global warming.

"Bandwagon" behavior was well-known even before modern psychology began to measure such phenomena. The ancient Romans elected their annual officials by reporting to the polling place in the Campus Martius and gathering in roped-off areas reserved for each ancient tribe (there were three): the roping-off (praecinctus) gave us our word for "precincts", although they were more like political wards.

Immediately before and during balloting, people would visit across the ropes and talk about the candidates and watch their progress as the ballots were tallied through the tribes and smaller subgroups (I should imagine they were voting by clans and families, though I don't know that). Thus it became political strategy to try to obtain support in the first groups to be polled, in order to sway those voting later. And yes, bribery was not uncommon in the later Republic. That's the essential bandwagon.

12 posted on 02/17/2013 12:28:44 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson