Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
you don't justify their action in that particular instance;

That's correct, a particular instance. Unlike you criminal apologists that find the police at fault in every instance.

I gave you the lawful justification my mother could have used to drive off the officer

You go ahead and shoot at a police officer, neighbor kid, delivery person, standing on or crossing your property, and see what happens to you.

649 posted on 02/15/2013 6:54:08 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]


To: Alaska Wolf
>> you don't justify their action in that particular instance;
>
> That's correct, a particular instance. Unlike you criminal apologists that find the police at fault in every instance.

I told you I'm a philosopher, I've made it clear I'm looking at the overall not a particular instance. How does that then make me a "criminal apologist", especially given that I've consistently been using Constitutions as my basis for reasoning?

I'm interested in the particulars of this instance, but the underlying philosophies present.

> I gave you the lawful justification my mother could have used to drive off the officer
>
> You go ahead and shoot at a police officer, neighbor kid, delivery person, standing on or crossing your property, and see what happens to you.

And you called me unbalanced!?
Where did I give any indication of shooting someone who wasn't breaking the law?

652 posted on 02/15/2013 7:21:28 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson