The officer isn't obligated to inform you.
read the constitution I do not ascribe to the theory that case law is needed to tell one what the Constitution means.
That isn't case law corroborating your contentions. I'm not playing your juvenile game. I disagree with many of the laws we have to abide by, but that doesn't make me immune to them. For example; I'm anti-abortion. Abortion is now legal according to the USSC. Does the fact that I disagree give me license or justification to take the lives of those involved?
The US Constitution is being constantly interpreted and challenged. It always will be as long as there are people on this earth. Why do we even need a Constitution and laws? Because people by their very nature are selfish, violent, wicked, evil and dishonest.
Ah, so anyone with a badge can run roughshod over your property and not inform you... right.
Guess that whole Magna Carta thing is an old, dead document and not, you know, part of the common law.
>> read the constitution I do not ascribe to the theory that case law is needed to tell one what the Constitution means.
>
> That isn’t case law corroborating your contentions. I’m not playing your juvenile game. I disagree with many of the laws we have to abide by, but that doesn’t make me immune to them. For example; I’m anti-abortion. Abortion is now legal according to the USSC.
There’s your problem. By what authority does the USSC have to prohibit the states themselves prohibiting abortion? Especially when, by the 14th Amendment, one could argue they are constrained to prohibit such activity as abortion (being murder), and by the 10th Amendment the States [or people thereof] are free to enact such anti-abortion laws as they see fit while the federal government is prohibited from interfering therein or altering such law. The answer is that they do not legitimately have that power, the enaction of such laws are not prohibited by the US Constitution.
Interestingly the justification given was a “right to privacy” — well what’s happened to privacy in one’s home? On one’s person? When one travels? — The 4th is regularly spit upon by “Law Enforcement” and the Judiciary alike (remember the IN supreme court saying the State of IN “no longer recognizes the right to resist UNLAWFUL police intrusion”).
> Does the fact that I disagree give me license or justification to take the lives of those involved?
I find it interesting you jump directly to taking their lives.
> The US Constitution is being constantly interpreted and challenged. It always will be as long as there are people on this earth. Why do we even need a Constitution and laws? Because people by their very nature are selfish, violent, wicked, evil and dishonest.
And these all apply to the government.