Citations need to be supported by case law.
Obviously it would have been different if he did have a warrant, no?
Why? Was she a suspect?
>> I gave you the citation
>
> Citations need to be supported by case law.
Alright, howabout this: I’m feeling lazy and don’t want to look up f—ing cases; moreover, I don’t have an annotated Constitution here.
(Furthermore, the idea that case law supersedes Constitutional law is ridiculous: it reduces our Constitution to the product of the Judiciary’s playing the children’s game of ‘Telephone’ with what it says instead of, you know, what it actually says.)
>> Obviously it would have been different if he did have a warrant, no?
>
> Why?
Because the warrant is the authorization to actually perform a search, obviously.
[To search w/o warrant is to search w/o authority.]
> Was she a suspect?
Irrelevant.