I refer you back to your post #399:
How long are they required to wait? How many man hours do you require to be wasted?
Silly me I though you were serious when you described it as, quoting again: "man hours do you require to be ?"
The fugitive had 6 days to surrender peacefully, didn't he?
Amazing. Who surrenders when there is a chance of escape? More to the point, who surrenders when, as he correctly predicted, he would be shot first chance any LEO had.
Then what evidence do you have that the POS was still alive? Awfully presumptuous of you, isn't it?
If he were dead, there wouldn't be any point in burning down the building, now would there? (Unless maybe the intent was as a terrorist threat against anyone else tempted to break the Code of Silence? Nahhh...)
Another presumption on your part. How could anyone know the condition of the fugitive?
They couldn't, but they did know the shooting had stopped.
How could anyone besides the bleeder know whose blood it was?
If there was any thought that it wasn't his blood would't that mean they deliberately burned an innocent civilian hostage?
Your mindless allegations are proof of your bleeding heart liberalism.
Hardly.
Two questions. You do understand what a ? signifies, do you not?
Silly me
Actually it is far worse.
Who surrenders
A fugitive seeking due process.
If he were dead, there wouldn't be any point in burning down the building, now would there?
Yes. It could be booby trapped. The POS was ruthless.
If there was any thought that it wasn't his blood would't that mean they deliberately burned an innocent civilian hostage?
No dufus. You do know that animals have blood coursing through their veins, don't you?