To: CynicalBear
He just shot two people. The fact he wasn’t shooting didn’t mean he intended to stop.
Let’s put it this way. You are in a store carrying your Concealed weapon. A guy comes in and shoots a clerk and a customer. Are you going to play judge and jury and execute him or obey the rule of law and presume he is innocent?
They fired a tear gas canister BTW.
336 posted on
02/14/2013 1:05:01 PM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: AppyPappy
>>Lets put it this way. You are in a store carrying your Concealed weapon. A guy comes in and shoots a clerk and a customer. Are you going to play judge and jury and execute him or obey the rule of law and presume he is innocent?<<
Should I burn the store down? That was really a rather obtuse comparison. Not even close to the same situation. In the store I do not have the suspect contained nor do I have the ability to stay away from his fire.
>> They fired a tear gas canister BTW.<<
They arent called incendiary smoke bombs for nothing. The intent was clearly fire.
371 posted on
02/14/2013 2:03:34 PM PST by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified. 1 Corinthians 2:2)
To: AppyPappy
Lets put it this way. You are in a store carrying your Concealed weapon. A guy comes in and shoots a clerk and a customer. Are you going to play judge and jury and execute him or obey the rule of law and presume he is innocent? I would pull back so he would stop firing to conserve ammo. Or maybe wing him and wait for him to bleed out. Oh, and look for a bullhorn. ;)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson