I still adhere to my point of view that you are out of line in casting aspersions against Marcella, until you have a handle on how Marcella intended to apply the word "crazy."
-- To claim he wasn't a kook is to support him. --
Actually, I see it the opposite way, but that's because my definition of "kook" is different from yours. Not to say that Dorner was justified, he wasn't. He acted in a depraved way, indifferent as to human life. Not all criminals are insane; and by definition, an insane person is not a criminal. To claim he wasn't a kook is just arguing over the definition of kook. Maybe you get my point, by now, maybe not.
He also likely would have received the finest sleazy leftist lawyers that area could dredge up.