Well said, Mrs!
Actually, having run the Moral Absolutes list for years since I invented it (with help over the years running it) I’ve seen my share of porn articles.
I remember one library they had to install rubber mats in front of the computers, since the men masturbating in front of them were messing up the floor.
I guess according to Gay State that’s a small price to pay for E-Z access pornography ON OUR DIME.
And of course, families with children just have to avoid public libraries.
Reminds me of years ago in the Eugene OR public library I was looking for some kind of art book when I happened to see a book stuck in sideways along the tops of the other books. Being the book neatnick that I am, I took it out to replace it correctly. The number/codes didn’t match, so I opened it up and read one paragraph of the most horrible and revolting pornography - and I thought - suppose a child read this!! It still makes me almost physically ill thinking of it, and I don’t remember the details.
There is no protection of pornography under the First Amendment if a person understands the intent of the writers and signers.
I never said I wanted easy access to porn on *anyone's* dime.Just remember that here in the US,Rush Limbaugh,Ronald Reagan and Free Republic are seen,by the Rat Party,as being *far* more dangerous than the filthiest porn you can imagine.So that would mean that here,at least,they'd be banned far quicker than any NAMBLA website.The best answer...although an imperfect one...is to drive porn out of business through lack of customers.
And if you're honest you *know* that I'm correct in what I said about Limbaugh,Reagan and FR.