Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
Porn doesn't do much for me. Personally, I'd rather not see some dude's johnson. Kills anything for me.

That aside, I do have an issue with government filtering any "objectionable" content of any sort regarding the internet. If someone's downloading or uploading child porn, throw him in the bighouse.

Filters is a door to open government filtering of anything down the road, including what could be considered "violent" (NRA), hate speech (what the government says it is), and anything else.

103 posted on 02/15/2013 6:53:32 PM PST by Darren McCarty (If most people were more than keyboard warriors, we might have won the election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darren McCarty
I agree that govt. defining as objectionable, and filtering content across he board is Tyranny with a capital T. However taxpayer-funded institutions (like, say, public libraries) --- shouldn't they be permitted --- required!---to keep the jerkoff programs as well as the BDSM (sex abuse, assault and torture for titillation) stuff off the screens so the normal public won't be afraid to bring their kids to the library?

It kills me that saying "Woowoo" to a fellow employee can be regarded as "creating a hostile work environment," but viewing deranged, mentally-aberrant filth in a public facility is all sacred and jus what the Founding Fathers had in mind.

106 posted on 02/16/2013 5:03:18 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson