A real conservative can’t talk enough about it. He/she is delighted w the chance to expound on the merits of conservatism, and why he/she embraces it. Your nasty response is identical to what one would expect from a liberal.
What is it, anyway, w you pro-soilers and nastiness? Reminds me of the stuff I’ve read on DU, whenever they discuss conservatives. Granted nastiness is the default of _some_ conservatives, it is not the default of most. Otoh, I’ve seen more nastiness from liberals in my life than I could describe in a very large book. It is their second nature, at least when they encounter a conservative.
“A real conservative can’t talk enough about it.”
__
How odd! Then your refusal to answer my question is an indication that you are not a real conservative? Why are you not “delighted w the chance to expound on the merits” of your argument?
Let me guess: You are afraid to expose your ideas to someone who you fear might have an opposing view.
Mr Rogers asked, “Can he run for President? Is his loyalty divided? In what sense would Obama’s loyalty be divided any more?”
If you don’t want to answer my question, why don’t you answer his? I think you’re just looking for excuses to duck the issue.
” He/she is delighted w the chance to expound on the merits of conservatism, and why he/she embraces it.”
I’ve done so for 12,000 posts. But the topic of THIS thread isn’t what conservative ideas sound great. It is taking an originalist approach to interpreting the US Constitution, which is generally a conservative view.
Why do you think we should substitute YOUR ideas for the legal words used by the Founders?