So now if anyone questions due process and/or tries to square how the police handled this matter (or future matters) with our constitution and bill of rights, we are ‘bleeding heart liberals’ or ‘criminal apologists’. gotcha.
Can’t you have a civil discussion on these constitutional matters without resorting to emotional appeals and ad homin attacks? No one that I have seen is supporting the cop killer. There are legitimate questions on the process however. If I had not heard it all go down with my own ears, I would probably not be questioning a thing, but I did and now I am bothered by it all a great deal. Not because the left wing nutter died, but because what this might mean in the future if we just blindly accept everything we are told by ‘authorities’ or ‘the media’ for that matter.
The next dude holed up in a cabin might not be a killer..just a gun owner refusing to surrender his 2A rights/ weapons to Obama’s security forces. The police have set precedent here if legitimate questions are not even asked. I think that is all some of us are asking.
Strawman. Did the shooter have an opportunity to peacefully surrender? Yes or no?
Can’t you have a civil discussion on these constitutional matters without resorting to emotional appeals and ad homin attacks?
Just reciprocating.
all some of us are asking.
Why didn't the shooter surrender peacefully? He had ample opportunities.