Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
Way back in the early 1960s the then anti-communist movement clearly identiied the people surrounding Theodore Roosevelt as having had policies not dissimilar to those advocated by the world socialist movement ~ to wit, TR was a progressive, just like his successors were progressives ~ and that whole crowd deep into the Kellog-Briand treaty was definitely questionable.

At that time there were still people around, active Conservatives, who'd known TR, FDR and the Taft's personally.

BTW, back then we used meeting halls and the mails to communicate ~ worked just as well.

The dichotomy you're talking about as having not occurred until recent times IS WRONG ~

331 posted on 02/14/2013 10:53:48 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

The dichotomy I’m talking about is one of Democratic = liberal/progressive and Republican = conservative.

Until recently both parties had liberal and conservative wings.


340 posted on 02/14/2013 2:28:03 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson