You do.
Or more precisely, any person who decides to buy a house in a neighborhood that includes common property that needs to be managed for the entire community.
Sadly, whenever you enter into a partnership, there needs to be some form of control associated with the partnership.
The best way to avoid the tyranny of an HOA is to not move into an HOA neighborhood. You will be happier, and the people who like having shared property and some measure of control over the community will also be happier.
The second best way, if you move into an HOA community, is to run for office. Then you can be the benevolent representative you think people will want.
Not me FRiend.
My point is what happens when the choice is removed and you have no alternative?
That's where this is heading, might take 30 years or so but that's where it's going.
Sadly, whenever you enter into a partnership, there needs to be some form of control associated with the partnership.
No, we have laws against wronging another, not the same as control.
The best way to avoid the tyranny of an HOA is to not move into an HOA neighborhood. You will be happier, and the people who like having shared property and some measure of control over the community will also be happier.
See my first point.
The second best way, if you move into an HOA community, is to run for office. Then you can be the benevolent representative you think people will want.
No thanks, I don't want to be corrupted, I would never get elected anyway because I am a "right wing extremest"