To: drypowder
Then when did obozo issue the order for the military to stand down?
I don’t believe there was a “stand down” order because doing nothing achieves the same result. Barry retired for the evening to his barca lounger and the WH NSC just watched the events unfold.
26 posted on
02/11/2013 9:57:48 AM PST by
lodi90
To: lodi90
Two US military commanders that were in the theater were relieved of duty for not following the order to stand down. The WH nor the Navy will admit to the reason these two were relieved of duty. On KSFO this morning, Brian Sussman also confirmed General Ham was relieved of duty for his failure to obey the stand down order. There are mounting questions as to why these men were relieved of duty when removing them was highly irregular as a military operational norm. So who are you going to believe that no stand down order was given? Where there is smoke..... and this entire administration is shrouded in smoke and mirrors. Check out the article at this web site. There are many more if you look.
http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=21443
To: lodi90; drypowder
You’re exactly right. No ‘stand down’ order was necessary. No military forces can cross a foreign border without CBA and only the POTUS can authorize that. All he had to do was nothing at all and that is what he did. Nothing.
37 posted on
02/11/2013 2:13:05 PM PST by
TigersEye
(The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson