Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU

Those are widely believed to be a forgery. Malachy lived in the 1100s. The prophecies were “discovered” in the 1500s. Their accuracy about popes prior to the 1500s is often pretty good. After the 1500s, they get more and more vague and off the mark.

They are believed to have been created for the political times of the 1500s.

I got this from:

http://www.catholic.com/quickquestions/do-the-prophecies-of-st-malachy-suggest-we-are-living-in-the-end-times

So, I’m not worried at all about St. Malachy.


9 posted on 02/11/2013 8:09:53 AM PST by married21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: married21

I am not “not all at worried”, although am familiar with that information. Sometimes claims of hoaxes are themselves false. One can debate whether or not some of the more recent descriptions were “hits”, but I would not get too complacent about this.


10 posted on 02/11/2013 8:15:45 AM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by Nature, not Nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: married21

Thanks for that link. That sounds better. I guess “Glory of the Olive” refers to Pope Benedict, but that doesn’t seem to make any sense.

“Peter the Roman” should be the next Pope. I guess “prophetic” tomes like Nostradamus were the product of that age.


12 posted on 02/11/2013 8:30:24 AM PST by ZULU (See: http://gatesofvienna.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson