[Colofornian]

"if you examine Mike McQueary’s subsequent testimony, which was given on 16 December 2011 at the preliminary hearing for Penn State’s former Athletic Director, Tim Curley, and its former Senior Vice President for Finance and Business, Gary Schultz, you’ll see that McQueary is steadfast in his assertion that he never saw “insertion.

(AMPU, I'd pull this quote if I were you...how many witnesses of a rape actually see specific "insertion"???...a ridiculous degree of actually disclaiming a rape...and a dangerous one...and one not worthy of Christians to introduce)

[aMorePerfectUnion]

“(AMPU, I’d pull this quote if I were you...how many witnesses of a rape actually see specific “insertion”???...a ridiculous degree of actually disclaiming a rape...and a dangerous one...and one not worthy of Christians to introduce)”

I believe it is germane to the conversation and inclusion doesn’t detract from the rest of what M. testified to seeing or not seeing. It is important because the grand jury said “anal rape”. There is not anal rape without insertion. If he did not witness rape, as he says he did not, then he did not tell Paterno he saw anal rape, as was claimed by the grand jury.