I’ve wondered about that - wouldn’t Obama telling Panetta to do what he needed to do constitute cross border authority? There are so many good followup questions to Lindsey Graham’s line.
You, my friend, are pissing into the wind. There are none.
Everyone is a part-time psychologist these days. We’re always trying to tie bad behavior to include the President.
This President is up to no good, but let’s not invent our own brand of Obama Derangement Syndrome.
We agree, and have had the similar thoughts about this as you have posted from about the time of the Benghazi action.
Thanks for posting your thoughts.
Oh, and the drone is on it's way.
I don’t doubt that Obama (or the shadow oligarchs that name represents) is capable of such, but I don’t think this was done for an election advantage. I don’t think the outcome of the 2012 election was ever in doubt. These people were never going to allow a legitimate election.
People are arming themselves because they expect a war.
I've had this shirt for about 5 years now. Wearing it out and about starts some interesting conversations.
ok “Dr.” Sam Vankin is a narcissist who writes about narcissism. He is completely without credentials except on the internet. Don’t quote him as a source
This does not mean that your diagnosis is wrong, I think it is correct. There are gobs of narcissist leaders.
You need to get real.
Why tell the Congressional GOP that Obama must be removed from the WH in cuffs and leg irons, or else, when under our system the people you are telling this to have no authority whatsoever to remove Obama much less jail him???
The House can vote to impeach Obama. Only the Senate can convict Obama. Even then, the Senate itself does not have the police power to arrest Obama at the WH and forcibly remove him.
A president who was impeached and convicted would, under our Constitution, be obligated to leave office. But that he would do agreeably, under our system. If it had to be forced, it could precipitate a crisis, to put it mildly. Any LE that would have the authority to go there and force a non-compliant president to vacate 1600 would need to be federal and would need to arise out of the Justice Dept such as federal marshalls. Even they could not take him to jail. Only later, if he were charged with a federal crime and convicted in court, could he be taken to jail.
In this corrupt system, good luck with that.
That’s a great column right there!
BUMP
BO is simply the most current manifestation of their demented thought processes, as many are just now finding out...
I saw Brigitte Gabriel (sp) this afternoon saying that there is more to come out about Benghazi.
I am also getting the feeling that the whole ‘banking crisis’ is orchestrated. Suspecting that the peeps in charge are not ‘capitalists’...but communists. Where in the hell is Corzine and why hasn’t he been charged????
I do believe Benghazi was a botched kidnapping attempt of the ambassador. Saying it was engineered by Obama, might be a bridge to far....
I have felt this for some time now...from the beginning . Then there WAS all this talk about whether Obama would release the guy. I was certain that this was his plan. Why else not do everything in your power to save your own appointed ambassador and be the hero? It was too obvious for many to believe. But, I say it is the real reason. He was certain that Stevens would just be kidnapped, according to plan. Since it didn’t work that way, now it is the standard democrat standoff from giving information, denials, threats, you name it. Was Stevens running guns? I’m certain of that, too. Way too many people have testified that he was, not to mention that the guy Stevens met with was also involved.
I remember reading that theory in a thread here shortly after the Benghazi debacle. There was also another interesting theory that the whole charade was a ploy to get weaponry into the hands of the dissidents, which I tend to buy more easily.
A "prisoner swap" would have constituted "negotiating with terrorists" and Ubama would never have gotten away with it. On the other hand, Ubama likely had some other scenario in mind that would have enabled him to play the part of the "strong, competent leader in the face of national crisis" that would have made him "look presidential" and helped him mightily in the election. It is NEVER a coincidence when major crisis events like Benghazi happen in the months just prior to a big election.
By the way, no way was Ubama comfortable that his Chicago mob's vote fraud operation was enough to ensure his re-election. Ubama was desperately worried about turnout for Mittens, turnout that mysteriously didn't happen - - or maybe it did happen but was erased piecemeal in a strategic fashion by Ubama's vote fraud operation. (There's a reason the rats fight tooth and nail against any and all efforts to bring integrity and transparency to the election system.)
When the whole ploy went south and four Americans were killed, the administration came up with the "video done it" lie. Make no mistake - - the Ubama regime is the most dangerous and corrupt admionistration in history. Ubama is a terminal cancer, and if America is not already dead and gone (arguable) then it is gasping for air and struggling to cough up the malignant tumor and catch its breath.
Good luck, America.
bkmk for later
Was Christopher Dorner raised by a single mom?
I’d also recommend joining me and others in not capitalizing the name of barry-the-usurper. Capitalize the office, it deserves respect. he does not.