Skip to comments.
New bow fitted to Queen Elizabeth carrier
Navy Net ^
Posted on 02/09/2013 4:19:25 PM PST by Smartisan
Aircraft Carrier Alliance workers at Rosyth in Scotland successfully attached a 1,000-tonne bow unit to the huge ship, completing the forward part of her hull.
Yesterday, 7 February, the forward island section of the ship departed from Portsmouth to join the other parts of the vessel in Rosyth.
(Excerpt) Read more at navy-net.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; queenelizabeth; scotland; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
02/09/2013 4:19:31 PM PST
by
Smartisan
To: Smartisan
That is a big bow, who tied it?
//sarcasm
2
posted on
02/09/2013 4:21:24 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: Smartisan
Nice...
3
posted on
02/09/2013 4:26:33 PM PST
by
moose07
(the truth will out ,one day. liberals and logic: Never confuse the two! Hi MI# !)
To: Smartisan
So is this going to be called the QE3? /sarc>
4
posted on
02/09/2013 4:29:01 PM PST
by
mountn man
(ATTITUDE- The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It.)
To: Smartisan
5
posted on
02/09/2013 4:33:16 PM PST
by
Huskrrrr
To: Smartisan
Is that to be the class or the name? If it’s to be the name, that alone will make it target #1 for any enemy of the Crown to attack and sink.
6
posted on
02/09/2013 4:35:32 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Smartisan
The Brits are determined to build and equip two smallish entries in the modern supercarrier class — which is a wise precaution given that the Argentines are making noises again about the Falklands. Apart from national pride, the likelihood of substantial oil and gas deposits makes retention of those remote islands a paying proposition despite the burden of defending them.
To: Smartisan
OK yes technically this is a brand new bow. However the use of the adjective misleads as it implies there was some old bow that was replaced.
8
posted on
02/09/2013 4:42:13 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
To: SandRat
I would be more worried about the name they are going to give the second carrier: HMS Prince of Wales.
To: Oztrich Boy
‘However the use of the adjective misleads as it implies there was some old bow that was replaced.’
Yeah, I was kinda thinking along the same lines.
I even started to look up the 1-800 # for the Royal navy to see if I could make a spot bid on the old bow.
To: moose07
Thanks for putting the pic up, couldn’t figure it out.
To: Sigurdrifta
Take heart. They could have named it ‘’HMS Hood’’.
12
posted on
02/09/2013 4:50:03 PM PST
by
jmacusa
(Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
To: jmacusa
Didn’t turn out too well for the last HMS Prince of Wales either. Unfortunately.
13
posted on
02/09/2013 4:54:35 PM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
To: GeronL
14
posted on
02/09/2013 4:59:26 PM PST
by
mikrofon
(Must be Brit for 'hat' ;)
To: SandRat
Is that to be the class or the name? If its to be the name, that alone will make it target #1 for any enemy of the Crown to attack and sink. It's both.
And she's not the first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Elizabeth-class_battleship
Interestingly, the WWII Queen Elizabeth spent a couple of years sitting on the bottom of Alexandria Harbor. She and her sister ship, the Valiant, were both sunk at dockside by Italian frogmen.
But, since the harbor bottom was only a couple of feet below her keel, her condition wasn't readily apparent. The British set about repairing the two ships where they lay...and the Italians never realized the attack had been successful.
15
posted on
02/09/2013 5:00:46 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Rockingham; Smartisan
Why didn’t we just sell or give them the USS Enterprise and another fleet carrier?
16
posted on
02/09/2013 5:01:50 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
To: jmacusa
To: mikrofon
1,000 tons seems like a bit much for one of those. :)
18
posted on
02/09/2013 5:07:50 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: Red Steel
we could name a ship after Mooshell... the Repulsive!
19
posted on
02/09/2013 5:11:07 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: okie01
That is an interesting tidbit
20
posted on
02/09/2013 5:12:32 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson