Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stilloftyhenight

Your comment presumes the alternative was the better choice, when we know Mitt was (just barely) Dem-lite. The father of O’Care, 2nd A infringement, gay acceptance, installed Dems in positions of gov’t instead of GOP....the list goes on.

Next you’ll be telling me a GOP controlled Congress and one in the W.H. didn’t run up the debt and expand gov’t when they had 100% control? I suspect I’d get the ‘they followed the rules’ BS, instead of running roughshod over the opposition like the Dems have done EVERY SINCE TIME they can.

I guess to they deserved, nay DEMANDED, I vote for them just because they had an (R) after their name instead of EARNING the same.


77 posted on 02/09/2013 6:35:15 PM PST by i_robot73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73

We will have to agree to disagree. No third party can make it thanks to the two party cabal ensuring the victory of one or the other after Perot got 15% of the vote. There is simply no way a third party can overcome those obstacles to get on the ballot in all states. Notice that the two party cabal exempted themselves from those very restrictions.

The only way is to take back the Republican party. Even Ron Paul and his son understand this. The TEA party is making consistant gains. Yes there are loses, but there are also overwhelming victories. It will take time but we will win.


78 posted on 02/09/2013 6:56:25 PM PST by stilloftyhenight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson