Many words but little understanding of my point.
A blogger is under no obligation to write the truth.
He has no reputation, no assets, no identity.
He can be a homeless conspiracy nut.
He’s not even compelled to write grammatically or checked on any aspect of anything.
It’s “anything goes” with bloggers, they can write about Godzilla
stomping the crap out of Disneyland if they want to. Who’s to stop ‘em?
You’ll kindly forgive me for not ascribing the highest level of credibility to a blogger.
Even if he’s right, he most likely copied the info from another source.
Was a newspaperman, ever? Federalist newspapermen lied their asses off about the Constitution and pooh-poohed a Bill of Rights, hiding behind the awesome rep of their golem, the New York banker Alexander Hamilton. But the Antifederalists made it clear that no BoR would be a deal-breaker, so the Yankee businessmen acceded, after taking a mental note to smash the South and break down the BoR later. Which they did.
He has no reputation, no assets, no identity. He can be a homeless conspiracy nut.
Hmm, sounds like old Tom Paine to me. Didn't he die in the French Terror?
The American Revolution ruined a lot of the Signers.