Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: matt04

The nuclear power plant IS the power. Why would they shut it down after losing off site power? Sounds like a leftist plot.

I could be understanding this wrong. Someone enlighten me please


2 posted on 02/09/2013 5:51:25 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vaquero
Some of the safety functions require power, and some of the issues that require safety functions involve shutting down the local (steam and electricity) generators. Without power from the outside, there are "could happens" that could not be safely resolved.

So, if there is loss of power from the outside, the protocol is to make a graceful shut down.

4 posted on 02/09/2013 5:55:39 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero

Nuclear plans nee power to keep the reactor cool. Even when it is shut down tremendous amounts of heat are still produced. They rely on power from the grid to run the cooling systems, in the absence of said power they SCRAM the reactor and switch over to diesel generators to run the cooling system.

In Japan, they lost grid power and the tidal wave took out the generators.


5 posted on 02/09/2013 5:57:22 AM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero

The core of a conventional nuclear reactor continues to generate a lot of heat even after it is shut down by inserting the control rods. It takes many weeks for the heat generation to decrease to the point where the cooling system can be shut off. The plant has to have backup power to keep the cooling system going, or the core will heat up and eventually melt. How fast it heats up depends on how much cooling capacity remains and how long the reactor has been shut down. The first few hours are the most critical.

After the tsunami, the problems at the Japanese reactors began when the flood water wrecked the backup power systems and they lost the ability to sufficiently cool the (shut down) reactors.


6 posted on 02/09/2013 6:07:27 AM PST by Jordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero

really?


9 posted on 02/09/2013 6:33:48 AM PST by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero

“The nuclear power plant IS the power”

It’s just one source of the grid’s power, we get a lot of power here in Mass from as far away as Canada on a regular basis.


10 posted on 02/09/2013 6:35:20 AM PST by Sparky1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero

Even if it was a conventional plant, what would they do with all the power they generate if they were disconnected from the grid? Even “shut down” they can probably generate enough steam to keep the turbines spinning until they are connected again.


15 posted on 02/09/2013 7:43:45 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (What word begins with "O" and ends in economic collapse?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson