No, "electron spin resonance combined with uranium series isotopic analysis, and infrared/post-infrared luminescence dating...using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer equipped with a secondary electron multiplier."
Given the age range 300,000 to 500,000 years ago, I wonder why they haven’t proposed Hidelbergensis. There are a lot of H skulls of that age shown in the Evolution of Man exhibit funded by the Kock brothers at the Smithsonian Institution.