So it was a wise move to get rid of a man with a 90+% conservative voting record and replace him with a liberal democrat because Karl and the RINOs thought it was a good idea.
That there is some rock solid logic.
A 90+% conservative voting record. I repeat...a 90+% conservative voting record.
Now when someone explains in detail why replacing this guy with a libDem over an asinine statement is conductive to furthering conservative philosophy and governance, ping me.
Until then, good luck getting anyone with more than two functioning brain cells to buy that bullshit.
“Now when someone explains in detail why replacing this guy with a libDem over an asinine statement is conductive to furthering conservative philosophy and governance, ping me.”
After his “statement on rape” It would not matter one whit to me about his “conservative rating.” I would not trust Mr. Akln as far as I could throw him and I am over 70! Maybe he was successful for twelve years bull$hitting his constituents about his intellect, but it would not pass the voters of the whole State of Missouri, and they were ready to $hitcan McCaskill. And for the record, he was trying to replace a libDem not the reverse and he managed to blow it.