The “theory of Evolution” doesn’t even qualify as a scientific theory.
A theory needs to be:
Observable
Testable
Falsifiable
Evolutionists have never SEEN one species become another. We all see wildly different dogs, through selective breeding but they are still dogs. We have seen anti-biotic resistant bacteria, still bacteria. Which is actually a loss of information not a gain. It would be equivalent to “hand-cuff” resistant people because they have no arms. Evolutionist use the fossil record to draw lines between phyla and it’s the lines that are their proof.
I would refer you to the findings of OC Marsh over 130 years ago. Among other things, he traced equine evolution following the transition of horse ancestors to the modern horse (Observation), made predictions and later found fossils missing in the sequence (Testing), and no evidence has been found that did not support the ToE (Falsified).
That was succintly stated. I especially enjoyed the comment, “Evolutionists use the fossil record to draw lines between phyla and it’s the lines that are their proof.” That sits well on top of the fact that their fossil records,when used in conjunction with their geological records, are a cicular argument for determining the age of either group of records. Where the age of the rock is determined/known by the fossils found in it and the age of the fossil is determined/known by the age of the rock it is found in. Incidentally, there is no known uniform stratafication identified as representative data for verifying the dating of those sub sets. Piece-meal is not objective, it is alwys subject to a bias of interpretation.