Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: varyouga

1. No visible rearward movement of the gun (note ports near muzzle aren’t smeared).

2. No visible effect of recoil (his cheek and shoulder aren’t displaced.

3. Unusual smoke cloud for smokeless powder. Here’s a video of a skeet competition. You can’t even SEE any smoke (start after 1:30 or so). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgZqhAB2omE

4. It’s HARD to capture the moment at the perfect time when smoke is visible.

5. The vertical port smoke comes from behind the gun, with no smoke coming from the visible perforations on the left side.

6. The original of the vertical spoke plume appears about an inch wide, while the ports appear to extend about two inches along the barrel.

7. The port plume appears to originate from a single aperture source, not an elongated array of perforations.

8. Not carrying ammo like any skeet shooter.

Much of this is speculation, but would be easy to confirm by demonstration, trying to replicate the photo.


93 posted on 02/02/2013 9:59:59 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Tyranny -> Genocide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba

Upon further review of the photo, I conclude that there is photo evidence of recoil.


108 posted on 02/02/2013 11:37:03 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Tyranny -> Genocide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson