All I can tell you is that apparently, I haven't caught on to the fact that this is 2013, not 2012.
PJ-Comix noted that my data was from 2012, not 2013.
The data for 2013 shows seismic activity , that day, in that location.
Still, it's an earthquake in the region. I wonder if the depth is reported as being too low, would an actual shallower depth allow for a quake that is further away? Or, if it's not really a quake but an underground explosion, could the seismic readings from the USGS confuse the depth and location, making it look like it was further away and deeper than it really was?
-PJ
Could/would you please share your link to that 2013 01 21 seismic data? The log would be useful, but I also want to look at actual 3-axis seismograph signals. I no longer have a travel time chart, but probably still can trace back to the event on data from more distant seismic stations...
Thanks in advance!
Could/would you please share your link to that 2013 01 21 seismic data? The log would be useful, but I also want to look at actual 3-axis seismograph signals. I no longer have a travel time chart, but probably still can trace back to the event on data from more distant seismic stations...
Thanks in advance!
Could/would you please share your link to that 2013 01 21 seismic data? The log would be useful, but I also want to look at actual 3-axis seismograph signals. I no longer have a travel time chart, but probably still can trace back to the event on data from more distant seismic stations...
Thanks in advance!