Once again the left is attempting to reframe the argument and come up with fantasy definitions. There is no such thing as an “assault weapon” for self defence in civilian parlance. There is no right to bear arms simply for hunting. We need to sop letting the left frame the argument based on false pretext. Skeet is not the intent of the 2nd Amendment.
“Once again the left is attempting to reframe the argument and come up with fantasy definitions. There is no such thing as an assault weapon for self defence in civilian parlance.”
That’s right. We need to reframe definitions. These are not “assault weapons.” They are “sporting arms.”
Well said - thanks.