Even when you're being daft intentionally, you're still a fool.
Which agrees with the RF work in the third world being evil...
Maybe that's true in the fever swamp in which you live, but I assure you that I don't give any credibility to the many tin foil comments on this thread. Although it's true that I do not follow the current actions of the Rockefeller Foundation in the third world, please be assured that I understand, very well, the role they played in the Green Revolution two generations ago.
Ok, so then, (thinking out loud, I'm real "slow")... then the "Green Revolution", since you're saying this depiction is right out of the communist playbook, must not be "what the Rockefeller Foundation is doing in the third world".
Huh? The Green Revolution began more than 60 years ago. Since you've obviously been spared from the ravages of critical thinking, I'm going to write this very slowly for you.....I do not follow the current actions of the Rockefeller Foundation in the third world, please be assured that I understand, very well, the role they played in the Green Revolution two generations ago.
The depiction of the Green Revolution that I quoted from your lame article is the worst kind of Bolshevik propaganda that is targeted at people who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. These lies were created for people who could never be bothered to learn anything about the subject, but will believe any kind of crap that comes their way if it fits with their fixed mentality and depraved ideology. This kind of excrement is popular with folks who wrap the tin foil so tightly around their head that is stops the oxygen flow to their brain.
This is interesting, IMHO. So is the Green Revolution good or bad from your point of view.....I presume that means that you think the Green Revolution is not "evil".
You moron. You're here spouting off nonsense about something you know absolutely nothing about. If you knew the first thing about the Green Revolution, you wouldn't have embarrassed yourself by posting this tripe in the first place. But here you are trying to pass this crap off as something legit, when all it does is call into question your intelligence and your alleged conservative pedigree.
I was under the understanding that part of globalism was their fixation on "global" food supplies and the globalist firms' role in providing a "global" solution for the "global problem".
You provide an excellent example of everything that is wrong with the system of government education in this country today. You're so caught up in your tin foil craziness that you never bothered to learn anything about what it is you fear. Thanks to people like you, the public thinks scum like Rachel Carson are heroes, because they stood up to the toxic terrorists who were promoting the excessive use of pesticides, which besides killing off other plant and animal species, air, water, and land pollution, also distressed local farm economies; while robbing all the soil of its nutrients. These same people have never heard of Norman Borlaug who saved possibly a billion people, mostly children, from starvation by using support from the Rockefeller Foundation to create crops that would grow under near impossible conditions, and that required less land, less tilling, less pesticide, less herbicide, less fertilizer, and less water. Borlaug also led the charge against tin pot dictators who like to use food to keep the people compliant, and would starve them if they ever got uppity.
Rockefeller wanted to be a part of teaching people how to feed themselves because Communism was a very real threat in the third world, and food was the tool used by these wannabe totalitarians to gain and solidify their power. Rockefeller, in helping stem the rising tide of Communism, was also protecting his investments in these countries. Go figure, a capitalist wanting to protect his investments and wealth from a collectivist hoard of bloodsucking murderers. Rockefeller's support of the Green Revolution not only protected American investments and helped forestall the spread of Communism, it fed hundreds of millions who would have otherwise died from starvation.And know-nothing twits like you have the nerve to post your empty headed criticism here, on a conservative forum! The Communists hated the Green Revolution because it removed from them their ability to use food as a mechanism for control. You seem to have a problem with anticommunists and those who prevent starvation.
What's next for you? Will you post something from CPUSA about globalism and then try and pass it off as wanting serious discussion on an important topic? Why not share something with us from Democracy Now!? I'm sure you can find all sorts of tripe there damning capitalism for, gasp!, practicing capitalism. The article you posted here is unmitigated crap that should never see the light of day. That you posted it says a lot about who and what you are. You should be ashamed and embarrassed by this, but you're not. You're still trying to pass it off as something serious. It isn't. The way the author views the Green Revolution makes everything he writes nothing but lies - Communist lies. Sounds like you need more and better tin foil.