Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero

That is NOT the law. In fact what would you consider an “anchor” baby? We have hundreds of thousands here in the southwest.


32 posted on 01/26/2013 3:23:01 PM PST by chooseascreennamepat (Have you thought about going vegan, Karl?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: chooseascreennamepat

Well, yes, it is the law. It’s in the Constitution that a POTUS must be a “natural born citizen,” not the same thing as a “citizen” plain and simple. You can be a citizen, yet still not be eligible to run for POTUS if you aren’t “natural born.”

Anchor babies are another question. I think the courts made a huge mistake with that one, but it’s hard to see how it can be reversed now. Maybe it could be possible to have no MORE anchor babies. But our justice system is busted, and many or most of our judges are corrupt or deluded liberals, so that would be hard to achieve, too.

In any case, an anchor baby would not be eligible to run for POTUS under the Constitution.


34 posted on 01/26/2013 3:57:27 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson