1 posted on
01/25/2013 10:10:29 PM PST by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
"The filling up of a vacancy that happens during a recess must be done during the same recess in which the vacancy arose," the court said. I thought the issue was that Congress was really not in recess. Or is that another one? I didn't know when the vacancy occurred made a difference. Let's say a vacancy occurs and a President tries to fill the vacancy but has problems. Congress goes into recess. Congress then comes back into session. The President tries to fill the vacancy but encounters rejection. The Congress goes into recess. Why can't a President fill the appointment. The vacancy could have first opened up 3 years ago or whatever. what difference does that make? Just wondering.
To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends
3 posted on
01/25/2013 10:22:03 PM PST by
onyx
(FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
To: Steelfish
How dare they! Pull out your pen, Barry, and Executive
Order that federal court right out of existence.
4 posted on
01/25/2013 10:22:36 PM PST by
Sivad
(Nor Cal Red Turf)
To: Steelfish
"It could also severely restrict the president's use of a constitutional provision" They really are not paying attention over there, are they?
13 posted on
01/25/2013 11:44:47 PM PST by
Michael.SF.
(Obama lied, Stevens died.)
To: Steelfish
20 posted on
01/26/2013 3:07:02 AM PST by
Eye of Unk
(AR2 2013 is the American Revolution part 2 of 2013)
To: Steelfish
MEMO TO MR. OBAMA: If you will not like the answer that you should expect, do not ask the question.
23 posted on
01/26/2013 5:17:01 AM PST by
Rapscallion
(If you don't like his tyranny, wait until you get his social justice bill.)
To: Steelfish
any time the grey house is up set is just fine with me...
25 posted on
01/26/2013 5:57:16 AM PST by
The Wizard
(Madam President is my President now and in the future)
To: Steelfish
26 posted on
01/26/2013 6:01:39 AM PST by
IbJensen
(Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
To: Steelfish
The Incompetent One needn’t worry, Justice Roberts will fix it for him.
To: Steelfish
If this gets appealed to the SCOTUS will Justice Roberts again vote with the liberals just to “get along” like he did on Obamacare?
To: Steelfish
Barack Obama breached the constitution when he bypassed Congress to make appointments to a labour relations panel, a federal appeal court ruled on Friday in a decision that was condemned by the White House as "novel and unprecedented". So, have the three been removed from their positions pending appeal? Didn't think so. I smell dog and pony poop.
32 posted on
01/26/2013 6:50:26 AM PST by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: Steelfish
The problem is that Obama is bahaving like Hugo Chavez without the street thugs to back him up (I am sure he is working on that).
33 posted on
01/26/2013 6:56:59 AM PST by
Hacksaw
To: Steelfish
We have a President who willfully violated The Constitution. He has been told as much by a federal court by unanimous decision. When do the impeachment hearings begin...........(crickets)....?
If I recall correctly isn’t BO still in contempt of court for the Gulf drilling moretorium?
35 posted on
01/26/2013 7:18:45 AM PST by
PJammers
(I can't help it... It's my idiom!)
To: Steelfish
I’ll be suprised if the SCOTUS reverses the 7th Distric Appeals Court. Suck it up Barry.
36 posted on
01/26/2013 8:34:57 AM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
