Is that the same Mike Powers who said that he had indisputable proof that the glass was not broken???
He sure is credible.
Police or the shooters? Both stories are out there. There is the interview with the mothers who ‘just notice’ the shot out window. So that implicates the shooter(s). Other MULTIPLE sources ay the police. So, again, which is it?
The CNN overhead is not from the day of the shooting apparently. Later in the clip they show a military air conditioned/heated tent in front of the school with morning lighting. Clearly this is from the day after.
The clip shows an oval hole in the glass. The rest of the glass is in the frame but shattered. What you expect from tempered glass. The size of the glass meant it definitely was tempered - of that there is no doubt. You can not have that large a pane without it being tempered. But it would not seem ‘bullet-proof’ at all.
To create the oval patter one would have to shoot in a circular motion with some pretty good accuracy to basically cut through the tempering film. Doable. But by a 20 year with some minimum experience with the weapon?
So now there is a question of who AND when. Who - shooter(s), police? Still not clear. When - during the incident, after the incident, overnight?
But the pane is not shattered in the running photo. The young girl shows up in apparently her dads arms in other photos. So like a lot of other children she (and small subset of children) shows up in multiple photos at the scene even though there were supposed to be over 400 children there.
Just continued strangeness.....