Posted on 01/25/2013 9:12:50 AM PST by RummyChick
Secrecy makes perfect sense to me at this point. Computer and internet forensics take longer than all the other stuff, especially since the hard drive was smashed up.
That means they have to work backwards with the ISP provider to identify his internet traffic and go through all of it. That is going to take some time.
Playing stupid and keeping quiet about what they’ve found so far is the right thing to do on the off chance that there was some co-conspirator or someone who encouraged or pushed him towards this act.
Yapping about it publicly would just tip them off and give them time to disappear.
But you won’t convince the conspiracy minded that rational precaution is anything other than proof of their cherished conspiracy.
So you admit there is more to it. That’s all we are saying.
So you agree that the current official narrative is bogus?
*
What is it you want to see?? some dead bodies?? some pools of blood???
“So you admit there is more to it. Thats all we are saying.”
What? How the heck do you read that into my statement?
They have to do an investigation before they can know with any real certainty whether Lanza did or did not have any co-conspirators or accomplices. That doesn’t mean that he had any, it just means that they have to do an investigation before they can say whether he did or not. So, until they can determine that, it would be very foolish to just release everything to the public.
I made this brief list of links that answer the most asked questions regarding Sandy Hook. I just got tired of going back and pulling these up and wanted them all in one place. Please add whatever I missed:
Interview with one of two mothers who witnessed the kids running down to the firehouse, the Lanzas Honda doors opened [indication that it had already been searched], the broken glass at the front door, the unusual quiet just before gunshots rang out from inside the school, and the kids subsequently evacuating the building:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptbd6qRY358
Video at 0:24 of the broken glass front door:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/18/us/connecticut-shooting-adam-lanza-barber/index.html
Police dispatch report along with video of the broken glass front window at 0:50 on the video:
http://www.frequency.com/video/broken-glass-at-front-of-sandy-hook/72154872/-/5-85140
Police Dispatch of the Sandy Hook shooting:
http://nhregister.com/articles/2012/12/14/news/doc50cc0897adc1a203744261.txt?viewmode=2
STATE POLICE IDENTIFY WEAPONS USED IN SANDY HOOK
http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226
Details of shooting at Wikipedia with other resources and links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting
Acording to everything I’ve read (and it’s considerable), he left the rifle in the trunk of the car.
<>Acording to everything Ive read (and its considerable), he left the rifle in the trunk of the car.<>
Please post some of those everythings. Here’s one you obviously missed:
STATE POLICE IDENTIFY WEAPONS USED IN SANDY HOOK
http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226
That’s more than a little vague, and doesn’t jibe with with what I’ve read at other sites, but... whatever.
Yes, I wish I had time to go back and post links to every other article I’ve read, but that would take an enormous amount of time from a busy schedule.
I’m sure if you look around, you can find all sorts of references.
They'll all end up tracing back to articles that are citing the original lone NBC report.
That's leaving aside the nonsense percolating around the conservative blogosphere this past week repeating the original NBC report.
You need to learn to distinguish true, independently sourced "reports" from just a bunch of reports all repeating one wrong "report."
Any links that say other wise are lying links because the police stated this from day one and have not wavered from it at all.
I guess you’ve only been reading the conspiracy stuff, because all the official statements, and all of the reporting after the first day or two has said otherwise. Don’t take my word for it, though, go watch the video yourself, it’s clearly not a rifle:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLrxSgkqJQc
Pay particular attention to the video at about 0:06, when the camera zooms in to show a shotgun shell being ejected from the weapon.
No, I don’t believe the official narrative is bogus.
It is incomplete, pending the official report and is further complicated by all the bogus reporting by bloggers, most of whom are probably in it for the ad click money the additional hits bring in when stirring the controversy pot by posting sensationalized material, even when they know it’s crap.
I think it is rational to keep the investigation under wraps until they have finished the computer and internet forensics and are absolutely sure there is no one else implicated in facilitating or urging a psychotic to commit a heinous act.
But the crazoids will continue to insist that common sense is proof of cover-up. It really is tiresome.
Threat of secret prosecution can help keep those that know in line.
http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226
“#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber— model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine”
A single 30 round magazine???
But there were over a hundred rounds fired.
Did he carry in an ammo box and reload the single magazine 3 times in a few minutes?
And the correction and apology is.....where?
Also CBS analyst reporting that 2nd suspect was in custody the following morning.
The MSM and their integrity took a beating on the 15th it appears.
It’s a perfectly trivial matter, of course; however, I defer to your readings.
The rifle was in the car, the rifle was at home, the rifle was here, the rifle was there; none of it - least of all the facts of the case - is going to dissuade the political hacks, media morons, and liberal zealots who have got themselves into a frenzy over the whole thing and who have decided not to let a tragedy, no matter how awful, go to waste in pursuit of their desire to push their agenda.
That, more than anything else, is what should command attention, IMO.
Jungle taped 30 round magazines together — per police sources — and changed them after only firing about half of the load. So he had to have 8? to 10? of them atleast.
The bureaucrats involved in that crime are obviously lying to America about many things. They’re “guilty as hell, and they know it.” Foreign bribes, too, perhaps?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.