[Darksheare]

IT IS A STATEMENT THAT BEHAVIOR NEEDS TO BE CHANGED.

How hard is that to understand?
Apparently as hard as ‘Shall not be infringed” is to a politician.

The existence or nonexistence of drugs has no bearing.
The addictive behavior will still exist.

BEHAVIOR will STILL EXIST.
Plain enough for a child to understand it.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

"Do you have a preference between legality and illegality of alcohol and other addictive drugs?"

Will you answer that question, or continue to feebly dodge it?

The existence or nonexistence of drugs has no bearing. The addictive behavior will still exist.

The highness or lowness of tax rates also has no bearing on whether the addictive behavior will still exist - does that mean you have no preference between high or low taxes?

Will you answer the question, or continue to feebly dodge it?