[kevkrom]

Yeah, good luck with that. To win a case like this you’d have to show that:

1. The injury risks were greater than the average person could suspect
2. The NFL was aware of these greater risks
3. The NFL intentionally or negligently hid this information from the players

As noted upthread, who knew that repeated blows to the head could be dangerous? Well, that’s common sense — and it’s a risk that an average person should know about. This case is going to fail on point #1, without getting to #2 or #3.

[John W]

If we weren’t living in Bizarro World where black is white and wrong is right, I might agree with you.

[fr_freak]

Yeah, good luck with that. To win a case like this you’d have to show that:

To win a case like this all you need is a jury of low-IQ, brainwashed OWS-types who want to stick it to "the man". In other words, the litigants have a darn good chance of winning this.