To: FR_addict
Again, she is not giving sworn testimony today. Apparently, there is now a difference between testimony and sworn testimony.
To: Resettozero
When do they ever swear in????
36 posted on
01/23/2013 11:25:34 AM PST by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Great vid by ShorelineMike! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOZjJk6nbD4&feature=plcp)
To: Resettozero
Again, she is not giving sworn testimony today. Apparently, there is now a difference between testimony and sworn testimony. Thank you for that important information!
She is testifying before congress, but what precisely does that mean?
About the same as taking responsibility I reckon.
38 posted on
01/23/2013 11:26:14 AM PST by
onyx
(FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
To: Resettozero
No doubt, Hillary would refuse to testify it were under oath.
The Board was far from being non-partisan. Pickering is a career diplomat and Mullen is also a career military officer. The other three members of the board were career government bureaucrats. There should have been an outside investigation.
44 posted on
01/23/2013 11:28:39 AM PST by
kabar
To: Resettozero
Not under oath = no perjury.
60 posted on
01/23/2013 11:34:12 AM PST by
shooter223
(the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
To: Resettozero
This was an issue with Holder in Fast and Furious i believe. Its not a courtesy they would extend you or I.
79 posted on
01/23/2013 11:41:44 AM PST by
wiggen
(The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson